Friday, 18 September 2015

Joining it all up (from south west Finland)

I have just spent an inspiring few days with John Quinton visiting the Pyhajarvi Instituutti at Eura on Lake Pyhajarvi, in south west Finland.  We were hosted by Director Teija Kirkkala and her team and what was so impressive was the inter-connected vision for the institute.  The Institute has a joined up focus connecting nutrient use, farm management, lake water quality with human food demands and consumption.  The entire philsophy for the region was to join it all up so that issues of soil health were dealt with alongside market demands and also water quality.  This is I think a philsophy that we need to encourage to progress an intergrated future for food production and environmental quality......

And on a personal note John and I managed, at no extra cost and with no extra time, to cycle to and from the Institure from Turku Airport using hire bikes.  Joining up quality of life with quality of work..

Joining it all up.....

Here is a link to the photos of the farms and the lake visits 
Here is a link to the photos of the bike ride

Friday, 3 July 2015

Getting people talking.....

This week we in the EdenDTC hosted Simon West from Water Quality and Agriculture in Defra, London.  Along with our partners from Eden Rivers Trust and others from EdenDTC, we visited a number of farms and crictically opened the dialogue about the challanges of catchment science and water quality.  Whilst the answers are not always clear, one thing is certain.  getting people talking is absolutely critical.  Ther is nothing cooler in my mind than seeing a Defra Policy person like Simon talking to farmers in the field.  This is where it is folks - let's get the narrative right......  More pictures from the day are here.  

Thursday, 4 June 2015

Weather and climate? Calling Farmers and Stakeholders in the Avon....

In collaboration with our colleagues from the Avon Demonstration Test Catchment team and our 'NUTCAT' Project, we would like to invite you to contribute your knowledge and experience to understanding and improving water quality in the Avon catchment under the impact of climate change.

As a starting point, we would like to gather your views on how the weather, climate and other pressures affect the way you live and farm in the Avon, So, you are invited to join us for a short presentation by experts from the UK Met Office on historic and future climate changes and trends in the Avon, followed by some small group discussions and feedback on likely land use and land management changes in the Avon in the future.

The meeting will be at:
The Coppleridge Inn, Elm Hill, Motcombe, Dorset SP7 9HW Monday 
15th June, 6.00 -9.00 pm 

A sandwich buffet will be provided

We really hope you can join us on Monday 15th June.

The event is free but please reserve your place and supper in advance. For further information please contact Dr Mary Ockenden, Lancaster University. Tel 01524 593968 or Email:

The application form is also here.  

Saturday, 24 January 2015

Visit to the University of Lausanne

Just on my way back from a positive meeting with colleagues from Lancaster visiting the University of Lausanne talking about collaboration, they are an incredibly well matched department to us, with terrific labs including SIMS and NanoSims (apparently one of only 3 in the world) that they were very excited about and some upland alpine research platforms. The LEC equivalent partners are the Faculty of GeoScience and The Environment and I worked with Stuart Lane (ex Durham, Geomorphologist) and Eric Verrecchia. Philippe Moreillon was their Deputy Vice Chancellor and was also very encouraging and helpful. I enjoyed travelling with my Lancaster colleagues too, who included Andrew from University Managemnet, Lucas from the Management school, Simon from Literature and from Greg Lingustics. Thanks all for a positive time; a few photos here.

Friday, 5 December 2014

#IYS2015 Inspiring the Next Generation to Celebrate #WorldSoilDay

Plant a tree, inspire the next generation..... Today I have been proud to represent The British Society of Soil Science, where we have been out and about around Britain inspiring school children about soil. There is surely no better way to influence the future than to awaken young people about the value an importance of soils, as medium for plant growth, for providing clean water and air. Many thanks to all my colleagues out and about around the Uk and indeed the World, who have helped celebrate World Soils day and launch the International Year of Soil. My pictures from the day around Lancaster are here.

Tuesday, 2 December 2014

#IYS15 On the brink of the International Year of Soil!

I am very excited.

This Friday, 5th December kicks off the launch of the International Year of Soil (IYS) and as President of the British Society of Soil Science (BSSS), as well as a Professor of Soil and Water Science at Lancaster University, I am all of a buzz.

Soil is the often hidden resource that is essential for supporting everything we do in our lives, from providing the food we eat to purifying the water we drink and supporting the houses we live in. BSSS is planning a bumper set of activities, where thirty schools across the United Kingdom will be visited by a BSSS Soil Scientist for a tree planting this week. The society will also be marking the event in the Falkland Islands with a planting, and I will be doing a planting at Lancaster Girls Grammar School in Lancashire.

BSSS is looking to raise awareness of the importance of soils, celebrate our soils, catalyse initiatives and provide a modern perspective of soil science as well as marking the start of the road to the 2022 World Congress of Soil Science which BSSS will be hosting in Glasgow in August 2022.

To celebrate the start of the week here is a link to some recent soils films including a new one from Barry Rawlins on the importance of soils and the IYS.  Please get the message out there, let's get it alive on the social media and spread the word with #IYS15

Thanks, Phil


Saturday, 19 April 2014

On Floods and Farming……

With the terrible flooding that has been experienced around the UK this last winter, I have just taken part in a panel debate on Radio 4’s Farming Today, aired on 19th April 2014, Easter Saturday.   My role was to provide a view about the ‘science’ of flooding and farming, what we know and what we do not know.   I hope the following is a useful prĂ©cis of the position…..

To what extent does agriculture contribute to flooding events?

We know quite a lot about what happens in the soil and even at the field or paddock scale, but as the scale increases so does the uncertainty about what happens at  the catchment and basin scale – so the larger the catchment, the more uncertain is the link between cause and effect.  Local flooding can be reasonably attributed to local agricultural sources, such as the treading by animals or compaction arising from trafficking, all of which affect the soil hydraulic conductivity, but larger than this there are other things that come into play – topography, local geology, urban inputs etc..

To help the debate it is important to consider the science of flooding.  A flood occurs because the rate input if water to the river channel exceeds the capacity of the channel to hold the water, hence the catastrophic effects we can often see when the rivers burst their banks.  So, anything that can slow down the water flow of the inputs is a good thing for flooding, anything that speeds it up is not…...

About 60-70% of UK land is under agriculture so clearly this is an opportunity for agriculture to play a positive role in flood management (note also, conversely there are other responsibilities too in non agricultural land 30-40% of the land area).  Consider the analogy of a sponge.  A sponge is good at holding water and that is desirable and, by and large, is reasonable to say that soil can help act in this manner – having pores spaces and a hydraulic conductivity that can help slow down and store water.  Conversely a concrete car park is the opposite extreme as it has virtually no hydraulic conductivity below the surface, and the speed of water flow away from a concrete car park to he river channel is fast.  This is very undesirable, but on some occasions the same can happen to agricultural soil, as soil becomes compacted, overland (fast flowing) runoff is increased and to return to the original analogy, the sponge becomes destroyed. 

At the soil and field scale there has been lots of good research that supports this, for example:
1.     There is a significant positive relationship between saturated hydraulic conductivity and macroporosity.  Conversely, trading by livestock has been shown to reduce macroporosity.  Presence of animals, as opposed to forestry and trees, generally reduces the hydraulic conductivity.
2.     Trafficking by farm vehicles has a similar effect on soil storage.
3.     Some research has also shown an affect of compaction in urban parks, due to foot, bicycle and urban traffic.
4.     Recent work has shown that maize, plus other late sown crops, over wintering of livestock can all degrade soil structure in SW England.

However, and this is so important in the debate, at the catchment and basin scale there is considerable uncertainty about linking the field scale affects to the flood peak, as many contributing factors come into play.  A great study published by Miles Marshall et al in Hydrological Processes in 2009 focussed on the Pontbren Catchment in Wales, a small tributary of the River Severn.  Here, they tried to overcome the issues of scale by studying plots as well as the catchment up to 10 km2.  They say (I quote):

“there is little evidence to suggest that these effects propagate downstream. This does not imply that these effects do not exist, but rather that there has been little work to quantify this (O’Connell et al ., 2007) and that the effects are difficult to distinguish from catchment-scale data (Beven et al ., 2008).”  Miles Marshall et al in Hydrological Processes, in 2009

So, in summary, there is strong evidence at the field farm and plot scale, less so when we get to the large scale – just because of the complexity of real catchments. 

What solutions can farming offer?

There is no silver bullet!  However, I think that because of the sheer land are where farming is so dominant (60-70%) then there are lots of positive things that farmers can do.  As well as being food producers, farmers are inevitably custodians of the landscape and my view is that nobody knows how to manage their land better than farmers do!  So I start from the proviso that farmers know best and they do not want to lose soil and water from their land.  Back to the science briefly, it is all about slowing down the runoff, increasing the soils hydraulic conductivity – because water that is stored in the soils is better than fast overland flow.

Things that can be done:

1.     Soil mechanical management, to include use of tine to disrupt tramlines, topsoil lifting, sub-soiling, use of tine (especially on tramlines) – all of these are mechanical things that a farmer can do to improve structure and enhance pore space at depth.   
2.     Landscape management, to include hedgerows, berms, riparian areas, ponds.  Ponds offer great potential, historically there were many across the country, I am pleased to say numbers are now increasing, we have about 500000 ponds in the UK today, and more can be helpful.  In the upland, blocking upland drainage ditches can also be helpful, there is on-going work on Exmoor that is demonstrating this from Richard Brazier.
3.     Animal management.  In areas where the localised threat is obvious, over wintering of livestock outdoors is to be avoided, and measures to avoid the concentrating of livestock, for example around feed and drink troughs, should be encouraged, by regular movement of the troughs. 
4.     Tramline management.  A single pass of a shallow tine has been shown to have a positive effect from work by Martyn Silgram, spreading of straw and vegetation of tramline is also helpful.  In extreme cases, , a gantry system may be helpful to avoid creating tramlines. 
5.     Naturalizing - in some cases the use of trees can help, silvopasture systems are being talked about as having benefits, and strategic use of trees, tree shelter belts around the landscape. 
6.     ‘Hi Tech Plants’ – this is slightly ‘blue’ skies, but I was recently involved in a project where soil scientist and plan scientists collaborated to select grass plants with improved rooting properties that could be used to better retain water – there may be some hi – tech biological solutions out there.
7.     Partnerships, Tools, Strategic Assistance can be a great way forward.  In the South West (cited in Palmer and Smith, December 2013) a great initiative apparently hosted by The EA purchased and shared a subsoiler, and on 50% of the sites where it was used the soil structure was improved.  Palmer and Smith also suggest a field assessment tool for assessing soil structural stability – this has to be useful.    A great example is the National Defra Demonstration Test Catchments as a way of bringing farmers, catchments managers, residents, the EA, Rivers trusts and academics together to find a common long-term solution.  This has to be the way ahead. 

How can we prioritise between the protecting of farmland and the protection of homes?

This is difficult but we must try to do both.  What is very obvious, local hydrological connection between the farm and the flood, then we have to determine risk, and roll out strategies (outlined in the above) to cope with this.  If the risk is high and the hydrological linkage is compelling, then more of the measures above need to be used.  It is also about raising awareness and communities to deal with the flooding together.  I was recently involved in a collaborative project called the NERC Virtual Observatory where we tried to bring together farmers, agencies, and residents, to understand the issues and potential solutions, together. 

Is there choice between flood defence and food security?

Absolutely not, I do not see that it is at al helpful to polarise the debate here.  Clearly there are high-risk vulnerable flood areas that we need to take a close look at, but the most sensible solution is remembers that soil and farms are by and large well suited to retaining water, so if we can find an integrated solution with food production and reduced flooding, this has to be the way ahead.  We need to value and respect farmers as custodians of the landscape and help them, in partnerships with agencies and academics, use tools to assess risk and to find solutions together. 

P. M. Haygarth, Lancaster University, 16th April 2014